Everything about Ousios totally explained
Ousia (
Οὐσία), is the
Ancient Greek noun formed on the feminine present participle for the Greek verb "to be",
εἶναι, (such a participle in English, is "being" along with the Greek term
ontic). It is often translated, perhaps incorrectly, into
Latin and English as,
substantia and
essentia. The word can also be translated into Latin as accident though this would be in conflict with the understanding of
sumbebekos. Since Aristotle uses the term to show that things that are non-being are still things of substance.
Philosophical and scientific use
Greek
philosophers such as
Plato and (most importantly)
Aristotle used it often in their philosophy; these usages provide the main understanding of its current use, which is mainly in philosophical and theological contexts.
Aristotle used the term in his creation of
phyla for animals in biology. Aristotle used ousia and hypostasis in the sense that one,
hypostasis, would be a general existence or reality, while the other, ousia, would refer to specific individual things or beings.
Martin Heidegger later maintained that the original meaning of the word was lost in its translation to Latin and subsequently to modern languages. For him it meant "Being" and not "substance"; that is, not some other thing or being that "stood"(-stance) "under"(sub-). He also uses the bi-nomial
parousia -
apousia to mean 'presence' - 'absence' and the term
hypostasis to mean existence.
Early religious significance
Origen, (c. 182 – c. 251) used it when he said God is one genus of ousia yet three distinct species of
hypostasis: namely the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
The
Synods of Antioch in 264-268 condemned the term
homoousios (same substance) because of its roots in pagan Greek philosophy. The
Catholic Encyclopedia article on
Paul of Samosata (External Link
) states:
» It must be regarded as certain that the council which condemned Paul rejected the term homoousios; but naturally only in a false sense used by Paul; not, it seems because he meant by it a unity of Hypostasis in the Trinity (so St. Hilary), but because he intended by it a common substance out of which both Father and Son proceeded, or which it divided between them, — so St. Basil and St. Athanasius; but the question isn't clear. The objectors to the Nicene doctrine in the fourth century made copious use of this disapproval of the Nicene word by a famous council.
The Christian debate over Homoousios and Homoiousios
The
First Council of Nicaea in 325 debated the terms
homoousios and
homoiousios. The word homoousios means "same substance", whereas the word
homoiousios means "similar substance". The council affirmed the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (
Godhead) are of the homoousious (same substance). Many commentators--most notably Walter Gibbon--have noted that the entire controversy hung on a difference of the smallest Greek letter (i, or iota).
The
Chalcedonian Creed of 451 stated God is one ousia yet three
hypostases.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Ousios'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://ousia.totallyexplained.com">Ousia Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
